The capture of Nicolás Maduro and the preventive war against the Islamic Republic of Iran have sparked a debate about the political implications of international law. Some insist that these actions violate basic principles, such as state sovereignty and the prohibition of the use of force under the UN Charter. Others point out the dilemma between international law and Realpolitik and argue that a set of rules that effectively makes tyrants untouchable is politically untenable.
Together with our panel of renowned experts, we want to discuss: Is the prevalent invocation of international law still aimed at changing state behavior or has it become a mere mantra without real political relevance? And do the United Nations and its Security Council have a future in today’s geopolitical order?
We’re delighted to welcome as panelists: